“Didn’t you know people have tried eliminating folder systems before? It’s hard and hasn’t succeeded yet” is obvious and does not seriously engage with the possibility. My reading of your comment is that you aren’t actually interested in thinking about non-trivial changes here. There is no limit to how hard it can become to implement trivial changes behind the scenes it would be silly to ignore or downplay the ossification of desktop OS capability just because software developers continue to expend more and more effort to make smaller and smaller improvements. I’m not using “trivial” as a measure of ease of back-end implementation, but rather of how it actually changes user experience and productivity. ![]() Just imagine what a gift this will be to law enforcement, for example, once they can go to Apple all like “Hey, Siri, show me all users of Tor Browser around the time of $”. Halo 3 Delta leak), and other types of system modifications, then it would permanently ban that machine from XBOX LIVE. I remember my XBOX360 could detect modified DVD drive firmware, launches of individual pieces of software (e.g. This isn’t hypothetical doom-saying, either: game consoles already work like this. How big of a privacy violation would it have to become to bother you, out of curiosity? If we let this continue we will end up in a future where full “Remote Attestation” of every hardware and software component is required to participate in the Internet. Everyone should have realized this when Apple’s OCSP responder went down in November 2020 and nobody could launch anything that wasn’t built in to the OS.Īccording to TFA this kind of verification will now occur every time an application is launched to deter post-verification “tampering” by you, the user. Sorry.The existence of Gatekeeper already causes a huge privacy violation by “requiring” my computer to phone home to verify the signature the first time it launches an application. (In Firefox, the new version is 2.0.2) Interesting that back around 2017, many "experts" warned about the risks of 1Password's public facing cloud storage getting hacked. Also, there's a new 1Password extension for browsers, the former "1Password X." They ask that all users migrate to it, as previous extension (4.7.5.x or something like that) is being phased out. A nuisance, and I wish the 1Password engineers could fix. Solution is to remove copies of app off external drives. It will complain about more than one copy of the app, and may not load. ![]() (Just out of curiosity: do other password managers do that? Anyone?) Only issue is that it gets confused if you have a clone, or TM backup, with the app on it. App still works exceptionally well, syncs seamlessly between devices, and it is so easy to share logins with others. Family subscription is probably the best deal out there. I'm used to the subscription now, but I get that it's a turnoff for many. And please, don't give me that spiel that the 'paid upgrade' to v 7 works fine with iCloud - if it does just post a link to where on AB's site it gives straightforward instructions on how to set it up - I can't find them anywhere. Something that doesn't stop working for no good reason. Any recommendations? Happy to pay for each upgrade say yearly of course, just not monthly ad aeternum. Goodbye, 1Password, it's been a good relationship but you got greedy and I am off in search of pastures new. ![]() It conveniently 'jams' on the login screen and stays there, having a little hissy fit because I don't want to subscribe to AgileBit's subscription model. If this does not help, please contact AgileBits support." Needless to say, restarting it does FA. I get the message "1Password failed to connect to 1Password Mini. I have a lot of 64-bit apps designed for the Intel architecture which run just fine on it. Well I took the plunge and bought a new Mac which came with OS11 Big Sur.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |